Would a vote for Britain to leave the EU impact environmental and energy policy?

AH: I think a Brexit would create so much uncertainty around, certainly UK energy policy, and also potentially EU energy policy.

Britain has been a major player in Europe on climate change and, as a result, has been a major player globally, leveraging its power through Europe. That simply will not happen if it is out.

The UK exercises that soft power on the international stage by being incredibly influential in the European Union, and it is an important voice in the European Union on climate change.

Without it, I think there is a very good chance that it would slow down climate change policy and ambitions, not only in Europe but possibly in the UK and globally.

Do you think this government are sympathetic towards environment policy?

AH: I think they are still supportive. Perhaps not as sympathetic as they were in coalition or before, but they are supportive. Certainly supportive of our strong positions on climate change. Perhaps a bit more confused on their energy policy but maybe they are starting to understand the opportunities in clean energy.

If we have a vote to leave and we have Brexit, I fear that the people who take over the levers of power will be considerably less sympathetic to tackling climate change and to environmental policy and regulations.

I don’t think it is far fetched to imagine a bonfire of environmental regulations in this country!

About The Carbon Tracker:
The Carbon Tracker have been producing financial risk analysis looking at exposure to investors from potential “stranded assets” around specific IPCC climate change scenarios.

When FT Lex went through the research conducted by The Carbon Tracker they concluded that their analysis was robust. In recent years, and especially during and since Paris COP21, held in December 2015, significant interest in the risks posed by stranded assets has been growing among politicians, bankers and investors.

Interview conducted by Nick Breeze


hobley brexit800 

More posts by Nick Breeze

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is the first of the big global conferences of 2020 that will lead us to COP26 in Glasgow where governments will be under enormous pressure to agree safe and realistic action for the future. With Extinction Rebellion (XR) and other protest groups converging in the Swiss alpine town of Davos, I asked their leading spokesperson, Rupert Read, whether the tone being set here is encouraging:


The UK is readying itself for the presidency of the 26th Conference of the Parties (COP26), to be held in Glasgow in November 2020. In the wake of the failure of COP25, a British presidency must bring to bear its accumulated powers in diplomacy, persuasion, purpose, and determination, to recreate trust in the Paris accord, kickstarting a new decade of meaningful achievements on safeguarding our collective future. 


Seeing the extent of environmental destruction in 2015, Jackie Bond started volunteering for the Green Party in Southwark, SE London. In the last year, aside for standing for the Greens in Vauxhall and doubled their share of the vote, she has worked extensively with Extinction Rebellion, organising civil actions in pursuit of radical climate action. In this interview with Nick Breeze, Jackie discusses how she got involved in XR, why we need to put the climate crisis at the centre of policymaking, and her strategy for creating change in the UK.


Longstanding climate change siren, Professor James Hansen talks to Nick Breeze about negative emissions technologies NET's, accelerating emissions, the need for international and intergenerational cooperations. Is he optimistic?


Addressing a wine industry on the frontline of climate change, Former President Obama said: “We are speeding our car towards the cliff at a very fast rate”. The audience and former president were invited to the launch of this new initiative by 326yr old port company CEO, Adrian Bridge, who is calling for solutions, saying “what we need to do is stop talking and start doing!” Nick Breeze reports.


A three day hearing at the High Court is in process that will decide whether an injunction be granted, effectively preventing any campaigning that might negatively impact the economic interests of UKOG and their associated companies.