We will be streaming all Keynotes and the panel debate. Climate engineering, and especially solar radiation management proposals are met with a range of responses from dread and fear to cheers or "hurry up and deploy". Their are no actual large-scale interventions that have been researched and are ready for deployment as yet. However, proposals to cool the planet range from marine cloud brightening to create whiter clouds to increase the reflectivity of the planet, to spewing millions of tonnes of particles into the stratosphere to create a reflective shield. Other proposals include creating space satellite shades that could create cooling, if ever realised.

In this following video I have edited together a compilation of points of views from people I have interviewed or recorded over the last 18 months on the subject of climate engineering (also called "geoengineering").

The streaming player will be made live here on Friday morning as the conference opens.


Friday 13 March (All times are GMT - please visit www.timeanddate.com/worldclock to convert to your local time)

9.00 Welcome & Introduction

9.30 Keynote Lecture: Ken Caldeira

10.00 Keynote Lecture: Phil Rasch

11.00 Technical Session 1: Climate Modelling. Chair: Lesley Gray

Jim Haywood 'Results from GEOMIP and SRM simulations with the Hadley Centre Model'

Scott Osprey 'The long-standing dynamical impacts of climate engineering using stratospheric sulphate aerosol'

Andy Jarvis 'Deeply ignorant rationality: A solar radiation management case study'

Stephen Salter 'Can we get a win-win result for the side effects of marine cloud brightening by use of coded modulation of condensation nucleus concentration?'

12.30 Lunch & Lunchtime Perspectives. Chair: Olaf Corry

Ian Simpson 'Evidence and theory of current climate engineering programs'

Josefina Fraile-Martin 'Civil Society and Geoengineering'

14.00 Keynote Lecture: David MacKay

14.30 Keynote Lecture: Lynn Russell

15.30 Technical Session 2: Impacts, Implications & Consequences. Chair: Nem Vaughan

Piers Forster 'Potentially damaging precipitation side effects from solar radiation management'

Ben Kravitz 'SRM Impacts on the Hydrological Cycle'

Andy Wiltshire 'Future Ecosystem Services, Climate Mitigation and Geo-Engineering'

Sebastian Eastham 'Sensitivities of Human Health to Aerosol Climate Engineering'

Friday 13th Panel Debate:

19.00 - 21.00 Panel discussion, Lady Mitchell Hall, Sidgwick Site. Chair: Oliver Morton. Panellists: Martin Rees, Amartya Sen, Onora O'Neill, David Keith.

Saturday 14 March (Engineering Department, Trumpington Street Cambridge, CB2 1PZ)

9.30 Keynote Lecture: David Keith

10.00 Keynote Lecture: Duncan McLaren

11.00 Session 3: Engineering Systems. Chair: Hugh Hunt

Hugh Hunt 'Delivering particles to the stratosphere - SPICE WP2'
Chris Burgoyne 'Some engineering aspects of a Geoengineering balloon and tether'
Julian Evans 'The quest for ingenerate resources to promote longevity of the ocean mirror'
John Latham 'Marine Cloud Brightening'

12.30 Lunch & Lunchtime Perspectives. Chair: Duncan McLaren

Holly Buck 'Contested infrastructure: insights from large-scale development projects'
Bronislaw Szerszynski 'A bibliometric study of solar radiation management science: publications and patents'

14.00 Keynote Lecture: Tom Ackerman

14.30 Keynote Lecture: Matthew Watson

15.30 Session 4: Atmospheric Effects. Chair: Matthew Watson

Francis Pope 'Atmospheric chemistry of mineral particles in the stratosphere: implications for ozone chemistry and stratospheric particle injection'
Graham Mann 'Quantifying the radiative forcing from the 1991 Mt Pinatubo eruption'

Peter Davidson 'The impact, implications and consequences of the use of manufactured particles to improve the feasibility and reduce risk for a Stratospheric Solar Radiation Management (SRM) Insurance'

Peter Irvine 'Detection, Attribution and Climate Control - the Limits to Solar Radiation Management'

17.00 End

More information is available at the official SRMS Cambridge website here: http://www.srms-cambridge.eng.cam.ac.uk/programme

More posts by Nick Breeze

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is the first of the big global conferences of 2020 that will lead us to COP26 in Glasgow where governments will be under enormous pressure to agree safe and realistic action for the future. With Extinction Rebellion (XR) and other protest groups converging in the Swiss alpine town of Davos, I asked their leading spokesperson, Rupert Read, whether the tone being set here is encouraging:


The UK is readying itself for the presidency of the 26th Conference of the Parties (COP26), to be held in Glasgow in November 2020. In the wake of the failure of COP25, a British presidency must bring to bear its accumulated powers in diplomacy, persuasion, purpose, and determination, to recreate trust in the Paris accord, kickstarting a new decade of meaningful achievements on safeguarding our collective future. 


Seeing the extent of environmental destruction in 2015, Jackie Bond started volunteering for the Green Party in Southwark, SE London. In the last year, aside for standing for the Greens in Vauxhall and doubled their share of the vote, she has worked extensively with Extinction Rebellion, organising civil actions in pursuit of radical climate action. In this interview with Nick Breeze, Jackie discusses how she got involved in XR, why we need to put the climate crisis at the centre of policymaking, and her strategy for creating change in the UK.


Longstanding climate change siren, Professor James Hansen talks to Nick Breeze about negative emissions technologies NET's, accelerating emissions, the need for international and intergenerational cooperations. Is he optimistic?


Addressing a wine industry on the frontline of climate change, Former President Obama said: “We are speeding our car towards the cliff at a very fast rate”. The audience and former president were invited to the launch of this new initiative by 326yr old port company CEO, Adrian Bridge, who is calling for solutions, saying “what we need to do is stop talking and start doing!” Nick Breeze reports.


A three day hearing at the High Court is in process that will decide whether an injunction be granted, effectively preventing any campaigning that might negatively impact the economic interests of UKOG and their associated companies.